| 姓名 | 簡岳成(Yueh-Cheng Chien) | 電子郵件信箱 | m13915@eci.org.tw | |
| 畢業系所 | 營建工程系碩士班(Department and Graduate Institute of Constrction Engineering) | |||
| 畢業學位 | 碩士(Master) | 畢業時期 | 95學年第1學期 | |
| 論文名稱(中) | 辦理公共工程專案管理廠商含委託監造責任之探討－以某新建工程為例 | |||
| 論文名稱(英) | A Study on the Responsibility of Professional Construction Management （Including Supervision） Contractor Working on Public Construction Projects — A Case of New Building Construction | |||
| 檔案 |
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。 |
論文使用權限 | 校內外完全公開 | |
| 論文語文/頁數 | 中文/172 | |||
| 摘要(中) | 中文摘要 由於國內公共工程在規模、類型、性質及施工技術各方面日趨複雜龐大，加上施工工期較以往更為緊迫，執行上更顯困難。並於政府推動精簡人事政策，工程主辦機關限於業務量遞增、專業人力及能力普遍不足情況下，藉由委託民間專業資源，提供專案管理技術服務為未來之趨勢。且得視工程性質實際需要，將施工監造事項一併委託辦理。 專案管理廠商含施工監造在執行過程，為單一承攬契約之管理主體分別扮演工程兩個不同之「監督」角色，產生品管之位階不同，分別負責之監督項目重疊。且不論專案管理廠商與施工監造採單一承攬方式或為共同投標之承攬類型，就專案管理廠商與施工監造兩者之合作基礎及各自成立宗旨均係以營利為目的；再就涉及與專案管理廠商有關之業務，具有業務監督之利害關係，為維持專案管理廠商行政行為或審理裁判之公平與威信，應行避嫌而主動迴避，於專案管理廠商執行監造之立場實有可議之處，而有「球員兼裁判」之嫌。 本研究試圖藉由文獻回顧，分別從三級品管位階、契約合作性質、施工督導位階與相對權責及利益迴避制度，探討專案管理廠商含施工監造之適法性，並以實際案例解析其執行機制，最後併致結論及建議俾供爾後工程主辦機關欲採行委託專案管理模式及修法之參考。 |
|||
| 摘要(英) |
Abstract Since the domestic public constructions are more complex and huge in the aspects of scales, categories, characters and technologies day by day and the time limit for a construction project is more urgent than before, it is more difficult for the performance of public constructions. With the policy of personnel simplification, the workload of the construction organizer is increasing progressively and the organizer also lacks of professional talents and capacities. Therefore, it will be a trend that the private sector is trusted to use its professional resources to provide PCM (Professional Construction Management) technology services. And, the organizer may authorize the supervision of the construction together to the private sector according to the construction nature and the actual demand. In the construction process, the PCM firm, including construction supervisor, is a management subject of the single contracting agreement and plays two different “supervision” roles in the construction separately, bringing different classes in the quality control ranks and overlaps of supervision items. No matter if the PCM firm and the construction supervisor adopt single contracting method or another contracting types for mutual bidding, the corporation base between the PCM firm and the supervisor, or their own respective establishment purposes is aimed at making profits. Besides, all businesses that are involved with the PCM firm have the interests in the construction supervision. In order to maintain the fairness and reliability of administrative behaviors or approval judgments of the PCM firm, the PCM firm shall avoid anything that may bring aspersion and avoid any conflict of interest. If it is disputable that the PCM firm executes the supervision, the PCM firm would be suspected to be “A player also serves as a referee”. With review of history documents, this thesis tries to study the applicable law for the PCM firm including construction supervision from the three-grade quality control class, the cooperation nature of agreement, the construction supervision class, the relative rights and responsibilities, and the conflicts of interests. This thesis also uses actual cases to explain and analyze its performance system. Finally, this thesis concludes and suggests the applicable PCM mode for the construction organizer and the references for law modification in the future. |
|||
| 關鍵字(中) |
|
關鍵字(英) |
|
|
| 口試委員 |
|
|||
| 口試日期 | 2006-09-17 | 繳交日期 | 2007-01-08 | |