| 姓名 | 簡世明(Shih-ming Chien) | 電子郵件信箱 | smchien@mail.cyut.edu.tw | |
| 畢業系所 | 營建工程系碩士班(Department and Graduate Institute of Constrction Engineering) | |||
| 畢業學位 | 碩士(Master) | 畢業時期 | 96學年第1學期 | |
| 論文名稱(中) | 公共工程總價承攬契約中實作數量增減爭議之研究 | |||
| 論文名稱(英) | The Study on the Dispute of the Quantity Fluctuation in the Lump-Sum Contracts | |||
| 檔案 |
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。 |
論文使用權限 | 校內外均一年後公開 | |
| 論文語文/頁數 | 中文/178 | |||
| 摘要(中) |
傳統我國政府各機關在辦理工程興建發包時，大多採總價決標之承攬契約，用以規範業主與承包商間的權利與義務關係。而總價承攬契約就主辦機關契約條款規定，慣例而言，幾將大部分風險轉諸於承包商，難免有偏頗之嫌外，更因國內營造市場長久即有「低價搶標」之非常態競爭手段，若機關辦理採購發包決標予總價最低者之「總價契約」，對承包商得標後權益能否確保不無疑義。倘若於履約決算時實作數量與契約數量不一致，更迭生爭議為防範未然弭杜爭議於締約前，將是本研究之目的。 本文將依法規之原理、原則，探討在主辦機關與承包商間運用相當普遍之總價決標承攬契約之爭議。藉由文獻回顧瞭解各學者對總價承攬契約實務操作之經驗、觀點及定義，並蒐集採購法實施後國內公共工程契約範本以及實務上之判決案例分析，探討總價承攬契約下實作數量不符契約數量時之爭議點，及就民法債編各論「承攬」法條規定，參酌國外契約條款之法律效果，建議修正目前採購體系下契約之盲點，期能達到契約平等互惠之精神。傳統政府公共工程由於甲乙兩造契約地位懸殊，甲方優勢地位易主導整個契約擬訂及工程計價，產生實作數量決算時之爭議而顯失公平。 經探討後認為，總價承攬(最低價決標)契約之性質應明確定義於契約中，而不同性質契約必須搭配不同契約價金調整流程運作，乙方數量差異不得異議之一定程度認定，應考慮整體營造業之獲利水準，主辦機關定義為總價承攬性質之契約，決算數量差異應貫徹不為找補之精神。 綜上本研究建議提出較多元解決面向，使我國營造業及工程法制未來變革修法時，提供幾點明定於條文的可能方向，明確釐訂業主、承商雙方間採購、履約各階段之權利義務，降低因契約數量差異而衍生之爭議。 |
|||
| 摘要(英) |
Traditionally, when most of our governmental agencies award a
construction contract, they often adopt a lump sum contract to
stipulate the rights & obligations between both owner and
contractor. In terms of the contract conditions or conventions
made by the agency in charge, most of risks in the lump sum
contract are almost shifted to the contractor, which not only is
suspected to be unfair but also is doubtful if the rights &
interests of the contractor could be assured after winning the
bid as the agency in charge decides a “lump sum contract” with
the lowest fixed price as its procurement contract because
of the non-normal competition mean of “winning a award with a
low bid price” in the domestic construction market for a long
time. If the actual quantity in the final account is different
from that of the contract, there will be more disputes. The
purpose of this research is to prevent any dispute from
occurring again prior to contract signing. Based on legal theorems and principles, this article is to study the dispute over the lump sum contract generally adopted by the agency in charge and the contractor. Through a literature review, we can understand each scholar’s practical experiences, concepts and definitions for the lump sum contract. With the collection of domestic public construction contract models after the implementation of Procurement Act and with the analysis of practical judgment cases, we study the dispute over the inconsistency between the actual quantity and the quantity provided in the lump sum contract. According to the “Contracting”-related regulations in the “Kinds of Obligations” of Civic Law and with reference to the legal effect of foreign contract conditions, we suggest to modify the blind spot in the contract under our existed procurement system in expectation to achieve the spirit of contract equality and reciprocity. For the government’s traditionally public constructions, because of a wide status gap between Party A and Party B, the Party A’ is easy to be dominant in the whole contract making and the construction pricing with its superior status, which is obviously unfair for the final accounting of the actual quantity. After discussing and studying, we think the nature of lump sum (on lowest fixed price) contract shall be clearly defined in the contract and the procedure for performing the contracts, which are in different natures, shall be adjusted according to different contract payment. To a certain extent which the Party B’s quantity variances are identified without demur, it shall consider the overall profitability level in the construction industry. The contract that the agency in charge defines as a lump sum contract shall carry through the spirit of not making up a deficiency for the final accounting of quantity variances. In conclusion, this research suggests a more diversified dimension for solution, providing some potential directions, definitely clarifying the rights & obligations between both owner and contractor in each stage of procurement and contract execution, and reducing the occurrence of disputes resulted from quantity variances in the contract for the reformation of our construction industry and the modification of legal construction system in future. |
|||
| 關鍵字(中) |
|
關鍵字(英) |
|
|
| 口試委員 |
|
|||
| 口試日期 | 2007-10-31 | 繳交日期 | 2008-01-07 | |