| 姓名 | 侯勝彬(SHENG-PIN HOUR) | 電子郵件信箱 | m12hourp@cpami.gov.tw | |
| 畢業系所 | 營建工程系碩士班(Department and Graduate Institute of Constrction Engineering) | |||
| 畢業學位 | 碩士(Master) | 畢業時期 | 91學年第2學期 | |
| 論文名稱(中) | 從工程查核的角度探討公共工程品質常見缺失 | |||
| 論文名稱(英) | A study of frequent
defect of quality from the viewpoint of public construction check mechanism | |||
| 檔案 |
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。 |
論文使用權限 | 校內外完全公開 | |
| 論文語文/頁數 | 中文/90 | |||
| 摘要(中) | 摘 要 公共工程施工品質管理制度，從八十二年開始實施至今，歷經十年餘來的努力，公共工程品質雖然有著顯著而長足的進步，但是若干施作不良、管理不善之普遍性、潛在性的品質缺失問題依然存在；因此如何發掘和防止這些幾近於常態性的品質問題，進而提升公共工程品質，實為相關從業人員之重要課題。 本研究以查核的角度來探討工程施工中的品質缺失問題。嘗試以新QC七大手法之親和圖與關連圖，分析施工品質查核之缺失，以資料蒐集的方式建立施工進度之影響因子，建立層級決策分析之架構。 以問卷調查的方式，彙集學者、專家、主管機關；主辦、監造單位；承攬廠商等三方。對於施工查核普遍性缺失問題的預防或改善，該從何處著手，方可獲得最佳效果的看法；再以常用的多目標決策分析之AHP法，對施工查核缺失問題改善做重要性之評比分析，建立查核缺失改善優先順序之權重，提供工程從業人員作為解決或改善施工品質查核缺失分析之參考模式。 關鍵字：施工查核 品質管理 施工進度 AHP | |||
| 摘要(英) | ABSTRACT The management system on the construction quality of public construction has been carried out since 1993. Through 10 more years of effort, the quality of public construction has a remarkable progress, but there still are some defective duning constructions, improper managements and the potential quality defects everywhere. Therefore, how to discover and prevent the quality problem which is nearly close to the normality, and how to upgrade the public construction further are both important assignments for the relevant persons to study. This research is based on an inspection point of view to probe the quality problems of the constructions. I try to use Affinity Diagram and Interrelationship Diagram of 7 QC methods to analyze the shortcomings on inspecting construction quality. By means of collecting information, I investigate the factors which affect the progress of the construction, and form an analysis framework for the levels of policy decision. I use questionarie to collect the opinions from the scholars, the professionals and the authorities - How to prevent and improve the universal shortcomings on the construction inspection carried out by the 3 parties – the builder, the supervising unit and the contractor. How to get the best inspection effect? I use AHP method, a common decisive analysis wethod on multiple objectives, to proceed the grading, comparison and analysis on the significance of improving the shortcomings of construction inspection. I also develop a priority order for improving the shortcomings on inspection. This is a referential mode for the construction industry to solve or improve the shortcomings on quality inspection. Key words: Construction inspection, quality management, construction progress, AHP | |||
| 關鍵字(中) |
|
關鍵字(英) |
| |
| 口試委員 |
| |||