| 姓名 | 黃士益(shih-yi Huang) | 電子郵件信箱 | E-mail 資料不公開 | |
| 畢業系所 | 營建工程系碩士班(Department and Graduate Institute of Constrction Engineering) | |||
| 畢業學位 | 碩士(Master) | 畢業時期 | 93學年第2學期 | |
| 論文名稱(中) | 營建工程補助行為中非機關採購人員辦理採購時之法律地位 | |||
| 論文名稱(英) | Legal Status of Non-government Organization’s Procurement Personnel When Conducting Any Procurement in Construction Engineering Grant | |||
| 檔案 |
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。 |
論文使用權限 | 校內外完全公開 | |
| 論文語文/頁數 | 中文/132 | |||
| 摘要(中) | 營建工程所需之建造成本，往往金額龐大。對於具有公共目的性質或須增添公共設施之法人、團體而言，要其負擔整個營建工程之建造費用，似乎頗為艱難。基於最終公共目的之需要，政府得藉由補助行為「誘使」法人、團體間接代為執行營建工程之採購。政府採購法實施以前，於機關自行訂定之補助法令當中，往往僅針對接受補助之法人、團體。倘若違反補助法令之規定，補助機關有權利向法人、團體追討補助金或不予補助之。而上述規範之對象，皆未曾涵蓋辦理採購之採購人員，乃係由於其與法人、團體間係屬私法契約上之關係，一旦違法，得由法人、團體自行對其提起告訴。然採購法實施以後，符合機關補助法人、團體之規定者，除依採購法規定辦理採購外，法人、團體所屬之採購人員(即本文所稱非機關採購人員)亦須受採購人員倫理準則之規範，使得非機關採購人員於辦理採購時之法律地位受到影響。採購法立法之初，除為建立方便且公平之採購程序為目的外，亦對採購人員有所期盼，以致加入相關採購人員之規範。其規定中雖以機關採購人員為主，但部份法條內容對非機關採購人員卻似有差異矛盾之現象，如此對非機關採購人員而言，無端地受到與以往不同之法律地位。礙於現行採購法令未能明確規定非機關採購人員辦理採購時之法律關係，惟有確立出非機關採購人員辦理採購時之法律地位，方能使其明白身處所在之法律關係，瞭解於辦理採購時，本身所應負相關責任、權利與義務。 經過本文探討後，本文認為從營建工程補助金行為之法律性質與法人、團體接受補助辦理採購之性質觀之，非機關採購人員依採購法規定辦理採購之情形，符合依法令從事於公共事務之性質。若從其刑事責任上觀之，非機關採購人員於辦理採購時應屬刑法上公務員之性質，但僅限於辦理採購那段時間，視為短期或臨時性辦理「公務」之人員。因此，相較於機關採購人員之刑罰內容與其所享有之公法上之權利，採購法令對非機關採購人員之規定，卻有顯失合理、合平之對待。採購法令的規定致使非機關採購人員成為此種臨時性公務員身份，也造就了不同於原本私人之法律地位。就此，非機關採購人員因為採購法令未能明確予以規定，而致生如此顯失合理差異之法律地位，主管機關是否應該予以修訂。 未來不僅是營建工程方面，甚至更多行政專業事務亦將由於民營化趨勢影響下，交由私部門參與執行，以致產生許多刑法上公務員性質之人員，如此不同於私人以往法律地位之規定，應是私部門人員所應注意之切身問題。非機關採購人員接受營建工程補助於辦理採購時之法律地位屬刑法上公務員之性質，乃本文針對補助行為、採購法令規定與採購人員之權利義務所提出之見解，若主管機關於認定上，有同於本文之見解，是否應對採購人員之相關法令作一修訂以符平等原則之意涵。 關鍵詞：政府採購法、補助、非機關採購人員、法律地位、刑法上公務員 | |||
| 摘要(英) | Legal Status of
Non-government Organization’s Procurement Personnel When Conducting Any
Procurement in Construction Engineering
Grant Abstract Construction usually costs a lot in manufacture operation. Also it is not easy for the juridical persons, organizations who are in the name of public purpose to afford the whole cost on building the construction engineering. On the basis of the need of the final public purpose, the government must lure juridical persons, organizations into carrying out the purchase which builds the project indirectly with the behavior of subsidizing. Before the Government Procurement Act (GPA) is acted, regulations only stipulated for the rights and obligations between government and juridical persons, organizations. However, it even more included the procurement personnel who are working in juridical persons and organizations after GPA is acted. It gives big influence for these persons when they are executing the purchases. As GPA was formulated, the government expected that there will be fair and suitable for these procurement personnel. Also, the government believed that these persons should be specialized. That’s why GPA extra states them. As we know that GPA is the law which mainly suited by the government organization’s procurement personnel. However, only few parts have stated for non-government organization’s procurement personnel. As far as non-government organization’s procurement personnel are concerned, this Act is not suitable. Therefore, there might be some problems appeared when they are executing the purchases. This thesis there discussed legal status of non-government organization’s procurement personnel when conducting any procurement in construction engineering grant. It is founded that there are some problems when non-government organization’s procurement personnel purchasing according to GPA. Therefore, we could consider them as a public official of Criminal Act as the period of the time when they are executing the purchases. Maybe we can give them the name of short-term or temporary public official. In this thesis, it is conduced being unfair and unreasonable if non-government organization’s procurement personnel are treated as public official when they are executing the purchases. | |||
| 關鍵字(中) |
|
關鍵字(英) |
| |
| 口試委員 |
| |||