| 姓名 | 楊明憲(Ming-Hsien Yang) | 電子郵件信箱 | jerry_yang623@hotmail.com | |
| 畢業系所 | 營建工程系碩士班(Department and Graduate Institute of Constrction Engineering) | |||
| 畢業學位 | 碩士(Master) | 畢業時期 | 94學年第2學期 | |
| 論文名稱(中) | 機關辦理工程委託專案管理時應否與監造一併辦理之研究 | |||
| 論文名稱(英) | Whether PCM Should Include Supervision When Working on the Construction Projects | |||
| 檔案 |
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。 |
論文使用權限 | 校內外完全公開 | |
| 論文語文/頁數 | 中文/162 | |||
| 摘要(中) | 國內現行專案管理制度分為「專案管理與施工監造得一併辦理」及「專案管理與施工監造分別辦理」兩種模式。但由於甚多工程主辦機關並非工程專責單位，於工程督導時較無法勝認，因而委託PCM廠商代理其對監造單位施工督導。依據民法第103條「代理人於代理權限內，以本人名義所為之意思表示，直接對本人發生效力。前項規定，於應向本人意思表示，而向其代理人為之者準用之」。換言之，代理人為PCM廠商，本人乃指工程主辦機關，所為之意思表示對象，第三人係指設計監造單位或承包商。 就督導位階來說，專案管理廠商代理工程主辦機關，位階上即等同「起造人」，其任務為代理工程主辦機關督導監造單位有無確實監造。若將專案管理與監造一倂辦理，若發生監造單位監造不實之情形，專案管理廠商既為主辦機關之代理人，又與監造單位為同一合作團體，是否容易發生損及業主權益，進而影響工程品質之球員兼裁判之情形，乃本文之探討重心。 本文嘗試藉由國外專案管理制度，先釐清專案管理廠商與監造單位之權責區分，再以現行國內公共工程三級品管制度下，參與成員間之施工督導位階，探討機關委託專案管理在傳統模式與統包模式中，專案管理與監造分併辦理之合宜性，期能對公共工程施工品質之提升有所助益。 | |||
| 摘要(英) | Currently, the PCM
system in Taiwan can be classified into 「PCM include supervision in one
process」 and 「PCM and supervision in separate processes」. However, due
to most of the time the construction sponsor is not the entity
responsible for construction, they cannot supervise the construction. As
the result, they authorize PCM Company to supervise the supervision unit
during the construction. In accordance with Civil Law Act 103, “Agent,
within the authority, can act on behalf of the client while the client
is informed beforehand.” In other words, the agent is the PCM Company;
the client is the construction sponsor entity, the third person means
design construction unit or contractor. As for the supervision class, PCM Company is the agent hired by construction sponsor entity; its rank is equal to “property owner” and its responsibility is to supervise, on behalf on the construction sponsor entity, on the construction. In case of PCM and supervision are handled in one process, and the construction unit does not construct accordingly. PCM Company is the agent hired by construction sponsor entity and it is the cooperation group with the construction unit. Whether or not this case will create the situation, where player is also the referee, what will affect proprietor’s right and further affect the construction quality. It is the focus of this paper. This paper adopts the foreign PCM system; first, we clarify the responsibility of PCM company and construction unit, and then use the three-stage quality control system currently used in domestic projects to participate in the supervision class among the members. Finally, discuss the entity that hires agent for PCM in traditional mode or include-all mode and the suitableness of process PCM and supervision separately and together is discussed. It is hoped that the result can help improve the construction quality of public works. | |||
| 關鍵字(中) |
|
關鍵字(英) |
| |
| 指導教授 |
| |||