| 姓名 | 洪本原(Ben-Yuan Hung) | 電子郵件信箱 | s9511617@cyut.edu.tw | |
| 畢業系所 | 營建工程系碩士班(Department and Graduate Institute of Constrction Engineering) | |||
| 畢業學位 | 碩士(Master) | 畢業時期 | 96學年第2學期 | |
| 論文名稱(中) | 政府採購法第八十五條之一修訂對工程爭議處理實務之影響 | |||
| 論文名稱(英) | Effects of Dispute Resolution Due to Amendment of Government Procurement Act Article 85-1 | |||
| 檔案 |
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。 |
論文使用權限 | 校內外均一年後公開 | |
| 論文語文/頁數 | 中文/161 | |||
| 摘要(中) |
政府採購法第八十五條之一第二項修正後，採先調解後仲裁（所謂『先調後仲』）之機制解決工程爭議。過往，機關因仲裁人代理人化、仲裁判斷結果有失公平與撤銷仲裁判斷之訴的條件過於嚴苛等，致機關不信任亦不願意仲裁。調解成立過程中需雙方合意讓步，而公務員惟恐陷入圖利泥沼中，而避免去同意接受調解建議。實務是否會產生以機關本身不妥協之態度，而調解委員因雙方差距過大而不作調解建議或方案，讓廠商無法依新修訂之採購法第八十五條之一尋求後續救濟。又廠商若把調解視為進入仲裁之一種工具，並在調解程序中虛與委蛇，只為尋求調解建議或方案，並依採購法修訂之新法在後續之仲裁中全力鋪陳，不免有「假意參與調解，實際追求仲裁」之「假調真仲」疑義。 本論文進行資料收集及各學說與實務等文獻內容分析與研討。為剖析「先調後仲」制度面臨之問題，除了瞭解該制度適用範圍與其施行所產生之疑義，亦對機關之公務員身份立場問題一併分析研究。本研究成果提出「先調後仲」制度三要件成立之分析，並建議機關與廠商都應對此制度採取正面積極之態度，以避免調解制度工具化、扭曲化。本論文建議修訂採購履約爭議調解規則，提出先調後仲制度之配套，供立法單位及各單位參考，使「先調後仲」制度廣受信賴與接受，以符合修定政府採購法第八十五條之一的立法意旨。 |
|||
| 摘要(英) |
After the amendment, the Paragraph 2, Article 85-1 of Government
Procurement Act provided that the construction dispute shall be
settled through the mechanism of mediation and arbitration in
sequence (what is called “Med-Arb”). In the past, the authority
hadn’t belief and was also unwilling to arbitrate because of
arbitrator agentization, unfair arbitration awards, and
excessively severe conditions for the revocation of arbitration
awards. In the process of conclusion of the mediation, it is
necessary for both parties to make an agreement and
concession. However, the public servants are afraid of being
fallen into a profit-making swamp so that they will more like to
avoid agreeing to accept the mediation suggestion. In practical
cases, the contractor cannot look for further relief according
to the Article 85-1 of the Government Procurement Act as amended
because the authority takes uncompromising attitudes in itself
and the mediation committee is unwilling to make a mediation
suggestion or project due to too-big differences between both
parties. Besides, if the contractor regarded the mediation as a
tool of entering the arbitration process, dealt with the other
party courteously but without sincerity in the mediation process
only in search of a mediation suggestion or project, and devoted
every effort to follow-up arbitration based on the Procurement
Act as amended, then it is unavoidable to have a doubtful point
of “Insincerely Playing a Part in Mediation but Actually Seek an
Arbitration”. With the data collection, this paper analyzes and studies such documentary contents as various theories and empirical cases. In order to dissect the problems faced by the “Med-Arb” system, we will not only understand its applicable scope and the doubtful point resulted from its implementation but also analyze & study the status or position of the public servants in the authority. For the result, this research provides the analysis of three essential elements for the “Med-Arb” system and also suggests both of the authority and the contractor shall take positive and active attitudes toward this system to avoid the mediation system from being toolized and distorted. This paper suggests to modify the Regulations Governing the Mediation for Dispute Regarding the Performance of the Contract for Government Procurement to provide a supporting measure for the Med-Arb system to the legislation institution and other organizations for their references, making the “Med-Arb” system be broadly trusted and accepted in conformity with the intention of Article 85-1 of the Government Procurement Act as amended. |
|||
| 關鍵字(中) |
|
關鍵字(英) |
|
|
| 口試委員 |
|
|||
| 口試日期 | 2008-07-29 | 繳交日期 | 2008-08-21 | |