| 姓名 | 廖哲逸(Che-Yi Liao) | 電子郵件信箱 | s9511641@cyut.edu.tw | |
| 畢業系所 | 營建工程系碩士班(Department and Graduate Institute of Constrction Engineering) | |||
| 畢業學位 | 碩士(Master) | 畢業時期 | 96學年第2學期 | |
| 論文名稱(中) | 從物有所值原則初探我國推動PFI模式之關鍵課題 | |||
| 論文名稱(英) | A Preliminary Exploration of Key Issues for Developing PFI in Taiwan: From Value for Money Perspective | |||
| 檔案 |
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。 |
論文使用權限 | 校內外完全公開 | |
| 論文語文/頁數 | 中文/101 | |||
| 摘要(中) |
公共建設投資具有帶動經濟成長的引擎效果，穩健的政府投資規劃與具前瞻性的中長程公共建設計畫，更可以建立人民對國家的信心，帶動民間投資與民間消費，進而促進國家經濟成長。世界各國在1980年代相繼面對財政赤字持續擴大、公共建設財源不足、國家發展基礎設施極待提升等壓力之下，為求促進產業發展並帶動經濟繁榮的政策推動不致受到阻礙與停頓，各國政府在公共服務的供給上開始運用各類型民間參與模式。除了國內現行所謂廣義的BOT模式，另一套由英國於1992年創始施行，至今已廣泛被應用於近30多國的PFI模式，則是國內促參政策面對的新挑戰。 PFI模式與BOT模式最根本的差異，在於PFI係在強調政府將公共服務特許由私部門提供，因此採購標的在公共服務水準，而非公共設施資產。故PFI模式在採購機制之設計上更強調包括制訂服務成果規範、服務績效與服務費用之對價機制、生命週期成本及風險合理分配等特點。 本研究從表現PFI專案績效的核心要素—物有所值原則（Value for Money，VfM）出發，彙整相關文獻對VfM之組成要素、VfM關鍵促動因子與PFI關鍵成功因子之討論，並進一步探討我國的民間參與公共建設制度若納入PFI模式時，在制度建置上所需正視的關鍵課題，以及對相關制度建置上之策略建議。 |
|||
| 摘要(英) |
Sound government investment planning and forward-looking
infrastructure projects can create people’s confidence in the
country, promote private investment and consumption, and thereby
foster economic growth. Countries in the 1980s faced increasing
pressure to improve public services with serious fiscal deficit.
In order to overcome the fiscal difficulty and to continuously
support industrial development for economic prosperity, many
state governments began to promote various types of private
participation models on supplying public services. In Taiwan,
the models of concession system, well known as BOT, have been
put into practice for nearly 15 years. Besides the concession
system, the other system PFI was developed by Britain government
in 1992 and has been broadly applied in nearly 30 countries. But
for Taiwan, it is still a new challenge to apply PFI models in
infrastructure projects. The basic difference between PFI and BOT system is that the public sector use PFI models to procure public services rather than solely facilities. In addition, there are some special characteristics in the mechanism design of PFI procurement, including performance specification, unitary payment, life cycle cost oriented, and rational risk allocation, etc.. This research takes the core factor for assessing the performance of PFI project- value for money (VfM)- as the main point of view to investigate the key issues for developing PFI models in Taiwan. The key issues would be selected from three sources, including the main factors of VfM assessment, VfM drivers in PFI projects, and critical success factors for PFI projects. Following the analysis of the PFI key issues, the corresponding strategies for promoting PFI models in Taiwan would be suggested. |
|||
| 關鍵字(中) |
|
關鍵字(英) |
|
|
| 口試委員 |
|
|||
| 口試日期 | 2008-07-29 | 繳交日期 | 2008-08-20 | |