| 姓名 | 張家銘(Chia-Ming Chang) | 電子郵件信箱 | gimi1107@yahoo.com.tw | |
| 畢業系所 | 營建工程系碩士班(Department and Graduate Institute of Constrction Engineering) | |||
| 畢業學位 | 碩士(Master) | 畢業時期 | 93學年第2學期 | |
| 論文名稱(中) | 錨錠反力架構對基樁靜承載試驗之適用性研究 | |||
| 論文名稱(英) | Study of Reaction Anchor Suitability in Static Loading Tests of Cast-in-piles | |||
| 檔案 |
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。 |
論文使用權限 | 校內外完全公開 | |
| 論文語文/頁數 | 中文/152 | |||
| 摘要(中) | 本論文在以錨樁變位整體穩定度來驗證試驗錨錠反力架構配置型式對基樁靜承載試驗適用性之研究。本研究蒐集若干選定之公路和建築工程現場實地載重試樁之結果，來探討基樁垂直載重試驗時所使用之十字型反力架構與工（H）字型反力架構兩個不同配置型式之相關行為，以期做為國內工程上實施現地基樁載重試驗時，錨錠反力架構的配置在型式選擇上之參考。 研究所得之分析結果整理，結論摘錄如下：(1)由研究結果得知，錨樁變位量會和相對變位量都有隨著樁長增加而變小的趨勢；案例樁徑相同時所得結果亦同，發現工字（H）型配置型式會優於十字型配置型式。(2)錨樁變位值的間距越小、越集中表示試驗架構配置的整體穩定度越好；反之則越差。結果顯示工字（H）型配置型式的錨樁整體變位行為穩定度較佳且符合規範要求優於十字型配置型式。建議採用工字（H）型配置施作試驗。(3)對載重試驗而言，在低載重試驗（600T以下）時兩者之錨樁相對變位量較一致，工字（H）型與十字型兩種配置型式皆適宜，考量經費則建議採用十字型配置較經濟。 | |||
| 摘要(英) | The thesis is based
on the total stability of the anchor pile strain which to attribute the
anchor reaction framework to the pile loading test. Sincerely hope that
could be the reference for the domestic construction pile loading
test. Thereinafter is the brief of the result of analysis of the research：(1) Due to the diagram of pile length and tensile strain the anchor pile strain decrease while the length of pile increase. The example case showed that H-type came with the better result than the x-type of the same pile diameter.(2) The stability of anchor pile reaction frame is as better as the interval of strain of anchor pile gets smaller and concentrated. Poor stability came with the opposite condition. Same as above the H-type is better and followed the specifications.(3) Both X and H type have the similar stability in low loading below 600T. For economy considerations, it is recommended to use the H-type. | |||
| 關鍵字(中) |
|
關鍵字(英) |
| |
| 指導教授 |
| |||