| 姓名 | 林季諍(Chi-Cheng Lin) | 電子郵件信箱 | g8911041@hotmail.com | |
| 畢業系所 | 營建工程系碩士班(Department and Graduate Institute of Constrction Engineering) | |||
| 畢業學位 | 碩士(Master) | 畢業時期 | 95學年第2學期 | |
| 論文名稱(中) | 應用主成份分析法與不安定指數法於河川流域崩塌潛勢影響評估-以陳有蘭溪為例 | |||
| 論文名稱(英) | Application of Principle Component Analysis and Dangerous Value Method on Landslide potential Analysis Using Chen-Yu-Lan Creek Basin | |||
| 檔案 |
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。 |
論文使用權限 | 校內外完全公開 | |
| 論文語文/頁數 | 中文/85 | |||
| 摘要(中) |
本研究的目的是應用地理資訊系統(GIS)之技術，首先配合不安定指數法之概念，建立一套評估區域性坡地安定之計量分析方法，針對不同狀況建置適宜之製圖模式，分析推論並設定各項影響災害發生的關鍵環境變數因子，進行崩塌潛感圖之建置。給予個別崩塌影響因子評分及權重，再透過GIS製圖模式的運算，評定崩塌敏感區之等級及空間分佈情形。本研究亦嘗試建立一套較合理的區域性山坡穩定評估流程，進一步將主成份分析法引入山崩潛感分析中，分別以上述兩種方法進行山崩潛感分區，選擇陳有蘭溪集水區為研究對象，經資料蒐集後萃取之山崩潛感因子包括：坡度、高程、土壤、土地利用、距河系距離。 本研究結果發現不安定指數法在分析危險區域、危險河道、辨識率的表現上都明顯優於主成分分析法；另外，在本研究區域崩塌潛感分析中，高程、土壤、距河系距離等三個因子，扮演著關鍵性的角色。再者，單獨以不安定指數法的分析而言，距河係距離對崩塌地的影響最大；而主成份分析法則以坡度對崩塌地的影響最大。 |
|||
| 摘要(英) | The
main purpose of the study was to utilize the Geographic
Information System (GIS) to develop a quantitative approach to
evaluate regional land-slide hazards in the mountainous areas
along the Chan-Yu-Lan Creek basin in central Taiwan. First, the
“dangerous value method DVM” was used to analyze the effects of
selected environmental factors for the development of land-slide
hazard map in compliance with various mapping techniques
suitable for the study area. According to the research data
collected, 5 environmental factors were selected (slope angle,
altitude, soil type, land-use, and river-distance) for the
study. A weighting system was designed and calculated to
represent the weight of each factor for evaluating the
land-slide hazards and to categorize the study area into various
hazard levels with respect to associated spatial distribution
patterns. The study also introduced the “principle component method PCM” in developing a rational approach for the regional land-slide hazard analysis as to produce a comparable hazard map for the study area. Results of the study indicated that the PCM exhibit superior performance than DVM in analyzing and identifying the high land-slide potential areas in the study area. Also, in general, altitude, soil-type and river-distance are the most critical factors in determining the hazards as revealed by the study results. Specifically, the factor “river-distance” and “slope angle” is the most influential factor as proven by the DVM and PCM, respectively. |
|||
| 關鍵字(中) |
|
關鍵字(英) |
|
|
| 口試委員 |
|
|||
| 口試日期 | 2007-07-13 | 繳交日期 | 2007-07-22 | |