| 姓名 | 陳寬叡(Kuan-Rui Chen) | 電子郵件信箱 | E-mail 資料不公開 | |
| 畢業系所 | 營建工程系碩士班(Department and Graduate Institute of Constrction Engineering) | |||
| 畢業學位 | 碩士(Master) | 畢業時期 | 95學年第2學期 | |
| 論文名稱(中) | CLSM材料實務應用與經濟效益分析-「以大台中地區管線工程為例」 | |||
| 論文名稱(英) | CLSM Material Applied on Pipeline Projects and its Economic Benefits Analysis in Taichung Area | |||
| 檔案 |
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。 |
論文使用權限 | 校內外都二年後公開 | |
| 論文語文/頁數 | 中文/122 | |||
| 摘要(中) |
國內管線工程之回填，因受限於無適當材料供應及施工時間短暫，管線機構之承包商素質不一等諸多因素，造成管線挖掘埋設道路修復後，路面下陷、龜裂及路面剝落等缺失，導致交通意外事故的發生，威脅到人民生命財產安全。有鑑於此，國內產官學研各界引進國外先進歐美國家所使用「控制性低強度材料」(Controlled
Low Strength Materials)，簡稱CLSM )取代管線工程所使用傳統回填材料。 本研究係以中部地區相關管線單位執行CLSM實際案例成果加以印證比較，瞭解各種材料配比組合與施工成本之關係；並說明CLSM試拌過程之相關品質管理與試拌結果，探討CLSM與傳統回填材料之施工進度、材料及成本間差異狀況；而在設計規劃階段，如要制定抗壓強度時，應依照現有道路行車條件而調整強度需求；另外在營建剩餘土方成本考量方面，比較採用間接轉運與直接處理之成本差異；並考慮中央與地方法源及主管機關合約規定，從如何落實現地營建剩餘土石方應用於CLSM施工問題加以研討，然後提出相關建議方案，期能有效解決CLSM施工問題，作為日後工程界施工時之參考。 |
|||
| 摘要(英) |
Backfills for domestic pipeline projects are constrained by
unsuitable material supply and short construction cycle, in
addition to various factors such as inconsistent work qualities
delivered by contractors. Thus, even the roads are repaved after
completion of pipeline digging and backfilling, the surface of
the road still could cave in, crack and peel off. These defects
can cause traffic accidents and threaten lives and the safety of
properties. In light of the above mentioned, domestic
industries, proper authorities and academics collectively
imported Controlled Low Strength Materials (CLSM), which are
common practices in European and US, to replace the traditional
backfill materials used by pipeline projects. This research adopts actual CLSM cases and its practiced results from relevant pipeline organization in central Taiwan, for comparison and verification, so as to understand compound mixes from various materials, and the relationship with ensuing construction cost. Then, this study illustrates relevant quality management and test mix result of CLSM test mixing processes, in order to explore the discrepancies in construction scheduling, material and cost between applying CLSM and traditional backfill materials. Therefore, at the planning stage, the compressive strength should be decided and adjusted according to existing conditions for car traveling on the roadway. Moreover, in cost consideration for construction residual soil, this study compares the cost differences for adopted indirect transport and direct handling. In addition to reflect on abiding laws prescribed by both central and local government, and regulations stipulated by the governing authorities, this study also explores how to effectively implement the application of onsite construction residual soil unto CLSM construction. Finally this study proposes relevant suggestions and hopes to effectively solve CLSM construction problems. Hence, it can be used as future references in the field of engineering. |
|||
| 關鍵字(中) |
|
關鍵字(英) |
|
|
| 口試委員 |
|
|||
| 口試日期 | 2007-07-07 | 繳交日期 | 2007-08-21 | |